European Court of Justice decides that KitKat iconic design is not entitled for intellectual property protection
Reading Time: 2 minutes

The European Court of Justice has decided that the iconic four-fingered design of Nestlé’s KitKat chocolate bar is not entitled to protection under the EU’s intellectual property protection scheme.

In a judgement on Wednesday (25 July), EU judges ruled against the European Union Intellectual Property Office’s (EUIPO) 2006 decision to register the shape of a KitKat chocolate bar as an EU trademark.

Swiss food giant Nestlé had appealed against the ECJ’s earlier 2016 decision to annul the EUIPO trademark but today saw its case, which was backed by the EUIPO itself, dismissed.

The ECJ insisted that a KitKat’s shape is not eligible for an EU trademark because it has not acquired “enough distinctive character through use” in enough member states.

Although the court acknowledged that the sweet treat had fulfilled enough criteria in 10 EU nations: Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Sweden and the UK, the judges maintained that it was not the case in Belgium, Ireland, Greece and Portugal.

Nestlé and the EUIPO complained that the court’s insistence on evaluating the case on a country-by-country basis was “incompatible with the unitary character” of the EU trademark and the single market.

However, the court cited case-law that maintains a product can only be registered with the EUIPO if it proves it has achieved distinctive character in areas it previously had not. It added in a statement that KitKats have not done that in “a significant part of the EU”.

The court also dismissed an appeal brought by Mondelez, formerly Cadbury Schweppes, which criticised the ECJ for admitting Nestlé’s product had achieved “distinctive character through use” in the ten EU countries.

The EUIPO registers close to 85,000 designs a year based on the appearance, shape, pattern and colour of a wide range of items, products and concepts. Protection at EU level allows a company or individual to challenge similar designs either directly with the EUIPO or in national courts.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: